Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2021 21:25:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Feb 6, 2021 0:38:41 GMT -5
I could be wrong but I think Frank Fellows was a fugitive AMW for some odd reason never took credit as a direct capture for despite it seeming like he was caught because of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by ninja108 on Feb 8, 2021 13:58:39 GMT -5
I could be wrong but I think Frank Fellows was a fugitive AMW for some odd reason never took credit as a direct capture for despite it seeming like he was caught because of them. That happened a lot in their later years which is why I tend to believe John Walsh when he says the direct capture result is higher then the final tally of 1,204(give or take) bad guys/gals. |
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Feb 8, 2021 18:33:51 GMT -5
I could be wrong but I think Frank Fellows was a fugitive AMW for some odd reason never took credit as a direct capture for despite it seeming like he was caught because of them. That happened a lot in their later years which is why I tend to believe John Walsh when he says the direct capture result is higher then the final tally of 1,204(give or take) bad guys/gals. I don't think JW ever said "the result is higher than the final tally" though but it's rather a matter of him "accidentally" stating a more appropriate number- in other words, it's easy to forget but he says he caught like 1463 fugitives because he misremembered the exact number the show officially took credit for which is understandable since there were so many captures but he ironically accidentally stated a more appropriate number anyway. So it's like "no John the finally tally was actually way less but now that I think about it, even though you forgot the final number, they probably should have taken credit for that many anyway so it doesn't matter" if that makes sense lol. |
|
