|
Post by HeadMarshal on Nov 13, 2013 13:14:16 GMT -5
Authorities in Nebraska have spent over 15 years trying to identify the killer of Leah Rowlands. AMW aired the case three times from 1997 to 2002. On Mar 10, 1997, Leah Rowlands was working at a gas station in Cozad, Nebraska, just off Interstate 80. Just before 10:30 AM, an unidentified white male in his 20s to 30s entered the gas station and got a bottle of pop. He then ordered Leah to empty the cash register, after that he leaned over the counter and shot her three times with a 9mm pistol, killing her. The killer got $150 in cash, a full tank of gas, the bottle of pop, a pack of cigarettes and a lighter. Surveillance tapes identified the killer's vehicle as a 1992-1995 model Pontiac Grand Am with very shiny chrome wheels, but couldn't clearly reveal the license plate. He was also wearing a dark leather jacket, dark hooded sweatshirt, dark sweatpants and was barefoot at the time of the murder. Thoughts? Judging by the killer's appearance, I suspect he was a transient who was travelling on Interstate 80 in the direction of either Omaha, Wyoming or Colorado. If that's true, then I'm not optimistic he'll be identified unless he confesses to someone. Admin Note #1: According to online research: If you have any information concerning this case, please contact your local Law Enforcement Agency or call the Cozad Police Department at 308-784-2366, the Nebraska State Patrol at 308-535-8047 or the Dawson County Sheriff`s Office at 308-324-3011.You may remain anonymous by calling the Dawson County Crime Stoppers at 308-784-1234. Admin Note #2: If you have any news-related updates on this case, please contact us here: amwfans.com/thread/1662/website-contact-formwww.northplattebulletin.com/index.asp?show=news&action=readStory&storyID=16669&pageID=3www.lincolncountycrimestoppers.com/unsolved.aspx
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Nov 13, 2013 22:14:18 GMT -5
I don't disagree with your theories. What angers me is she complied with all his demands and he shot her anyway. I wonder if he got overly excited or if this may have even been a thrill kill for him, and what he got from the robbery was not as important to him as bloodlust.
|
|
|
Post by theczar on Nov 14, 2013 0:55:28 GMT -5
This is almost the same as the Billy Brossman killer. The victim complied, and the person killed them anyway. With the length of time that has passed, the guy probably doesn't look anything like he does on the camera. And if he is a transient, my guess is he could be living on the streets somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by HeadMarshal on Jul 23, 2014 5:49:45 GMT -5
A new article was done regarding this case somewhat recently (mentions the murder was committed over 17 years ago so it was done this year, but it didn't mention a date). Authorities sent the surveillance photos of the killer to the Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles so they could use their new facial recognition software to try and get a match, but nothing panned out. www.krvn.com/news/index.php?more=fp66vx5m
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Apr 14, 2016 14:50:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by walshfan on Jun 20, 2017 15:18:00 GMT -5
This one stuck with me. What an extremely bizarre case.
Most cases of this nature happen in the overnight hours, but this one was in broad daylight. Plus the guy wandered around for a bit, let other witnesses see him and did nothing to hide his appearance or his car from the cameras. I agree that it seems this case should be solvable. Nebraska is a somewhat sparsely populated state with not much going on in the way of major crime and it wasn't from one of the bigger cities, so this is truly shocking.
I'm not sure I believe the transient angle. He doesn't seem disheveled enough to be homeless, plus that was a relatively newish car at the time.
The connection to the interstate is interesting and I get the feeling he is not from the area.
I recall reading about this one previously on a site about Nebraska unsolved. I think one of the most famous cases to ever happen out of the Cornhusker state was the disappearance of Christi Nichols, who has never been found even 30 years later. The husband Mark definitely seems guilty.
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Dec 6, 2017 1:45:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Maddog on Mar 1, 2018 0:15:32 GMT -5
The Nebraska State Police released a new detail three years ago: In the surveillance video, the killer looked directly at one of the security cameras and took a sip from his pop before killing her minutes later. nebraska.tv/archive/cold-cases-in-nebraska-leah-rowlandInterestingly, her family thinks this was a targeted hit where her ex-husband decided to have her killed, and the detective assigned to the case says that's definitely a possibility. What I can see, though, is that this person has more than likely killed before, and the FBI believes the killing was random as discussed in the article above. I do think robbery, despite everything regarding a possible hit, is still very likely. In addition, the station appears to be under new management, but the thing of it is, it is right off I-80, so a transient easily could have hit the place. The more I think of it, though, I do think that this was a hit. Here's why: Leah's brother noted how this person was dressed in attire that was popular in the Virgin Islands (where Leah used to own a restaurant with her husband), and as a Midwesterner, I know for a fact that early March can still be VERY cold in that area. Despite this, he had no problem walking barefoot and rolling his pants up. Here's another key tip: The Nebraska State Police have announced that they do have fingerprints available in this case in addition to the surveillance tape. With fingerprints done by computer these days, I'm sure that this person would have probably as a transient either popped-up by now from an arrest, or his prints would have been found at another scene. One thing I think police could still do after all of these years (and this has led to arrests in other similar cases) is draw a composite of the suspect based off of the surveillance. Might be more recognizable by that one person who could crack the case.
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Mar 1, 2018 0:52:26 GMT -5
Interesting new detail and this really is a case that could go either way in the robbery vs. planned hit angle.
I think a composite sketch would be a good idea as well.
|
|
|
Post by Maddog on Mar 4, 2018 0:31:27 GMT -5
Here's the thing: If he was a transient (and we know now that the NE State Police have his prints), I'm certain he would have been picked up for something else, and his prints would have been immediately linked to the killing in NE thanks to computer technology. That's why I think it sounds very plausible that he committed the killing and then fled back possibly to the Virgin Islands.
|
|
|
Post by Maddog on Oct 25, 2021 23:53:39 GMT -5
Out of curiosity, I went back and looked at this case because we now know that the killing of Billy Brossman is suspected to be linked to the I-70 Killer. I wanted to see if it was possible that Rowlands could also be a victim of the I-70 killer. Having looked at the information in both cases, I do not believe Rowland’s was killed by the I-70 Killer. My reasoning:
1) Although the I-70 Killer may have eventually started killing along I-35, there is no evidence that he killed at any point along I-80, which runs through Cozad, NE; 2) A 9mm Pistol was used in the Rowlands murder. The I-70 Killer is suspected of using a .22 in most of his killings and then later in Brossman’s, a .38 caliber; 3) The killer in the Rowland’s case did not have her go to the back of the store like in the I-70 Killings. He shot her behind the counter. 4) The physical descriptions do not add up. The killer of Brossman was described as 5’8” to 6’0”, and the I-70 Killer was around 5’5” to 5’9”. Rowlands’ Killer was between 6’1” and 6’3”. 5) Rowlands’ killer was barefoot at the time of her killing. I haven’t heard of any of the I-70 killings being committed while the killer was barefoot.
The murders in Rowlands’ case and in the I-70 killings seem to have been done for the thrill of killing, which at first, may make one suspect a connection, but I don’t believe they are connected.
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Oct 26, 2021 0:01:34 GMT -5
Well hey you doubted yourself on the I-70 when it looks now like you called it and were right all along so based on that you never know and never sell yourself short. Seriously though, I happen to agree the cases aren't related, plus I don't think the surveillance images match up. Also, Leah's killer seemed a little more brazen (or sloppy if you want to call it that) while the I-70 killer, despite also being seen on surveillance, seemed a little smarter in his planning.
|
|
|
Post by Maddog on Oct 26, 2021 0:06:25 GMT -5
Well hey you doubted yourself on the I-70 when it looks now like you called it and were right all along so based on that you never know and never sell yourself short. Seriously though, I happen to agree the cases aren't related, plus I don't think the surveillance images match up. Also, Leah's killer seemed a little more brazen (or sloppy if you want to call it that) while the I-70 killer, despite also being seen on surveillance, seemed a little smarter in his planning. Oh, don’t give me too much credit! 😉 I agree with you fully that Rowlands’ killer was sloppy. I have heard he left fingerprints behind, which I don’t believe the I-70 Killer (at least to my knowledge) did. Plus, he left a clue as to the vehicle he was driving.
|
|
|
Post by Scumhunter on Oct 26, 2021 0:08:04 GMT -5
Well hey you doubted yourself on the I-70 when it looks now like you called it and were right all along so based on that you never know and never sell yourself short. Seriously though, I happen to agree the cases aren't related, plus I don't think the surveillance images match up. Also, Leah's killer seemed a little more brazen (or sloppy if you want to call it that) while the I-70 killer, despite also being seen on surveillance, seemed a little smarter in his planning. Oh, don’t give me too much credit! 😉 I agree with you fully that Rowlands’ killer was sloppy. I have heard he left fingerprints behind, which I don’t believe the I-70 Killer (at least to my knowledge) did. Plus, he left a clue as to the vehicle he was driving. True plus the weird thing is it seems like brazen sloppiness almost. He looked right at the security camera, like I'm not from around here and all you people watching this will never see me again anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Maddog on Oct 26, 2021 0:19:56 GMT -5
Oh, don’t give me too much credit! 😉 I agree with you fully that Rowlands’ killer was sloppy. I have heard he left fingerprints behind, which I don’t believe the I-70 Killer (at least to my knowledge) did. Plus, he left a clue as to the vehicle he was driving. True plus the weird thing is it seems like brazen sloppiness almost. He looked right at the security camera, like I'm not from around here and all you people watching this will never see me again anyway. Exactly. In the Brossman killing, the only one with surveillance in the I-70 killings, I don’t ever remember seeing the killer stare at or acknowledge the surveillance camera. As John Walsh said in the profile of the killer, though: he was so brazen that he didn’t cover his face, but that was because he didn’t plan on leaving any witnesses.
|
|